Jorge Garcia Pichardo v. M Stainer
Petitioner: Jorge Garcia Pichardo
Respondent: M. Stainer
Case Number: 1:2012cv01254
Filed: August 1, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Tulare
Presiding Judge: Dennis L. Beck
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER DISMISSING Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Failure to Comply with Court Order signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 10/09/2012. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
August 20, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Regarding Exhaustion of State Court Remedies signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 08/20/2012. Show Cause Response due by 9/24/2012.(Flores, E)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jorge Garcia Pichardo v. M Stainer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: M. Stainer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jorge Garcia Pichardo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?