Bryant v. Apotex Inc et al
| Kevin D. Bryant |
| Apotex Inc, American Health Packaging, Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Major Pharmaceuticals Inc, Mylan Institutional Inc, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc and Teva Pharmaceuticals USA |
| 1:2012cv01377 |
| August 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Jennifer L. Thurston |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER; ORDER DENYING 86 Motion for Reconsideration and ORDER DENYING 88 Motion for Extension; ORDER DENYING 92 re Objections, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 05/13/2015. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM, DECISION And ORDER Re Defendants' Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Or, In The Alternative, For Summary Judgment (Doc. 78 ), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/1/2015. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER REQUIRING FILING OF STATUS REPORTS, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/2/2014. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Stay 56 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 5/3/2013. Case STAYED. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration 59 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/25/2013. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER & WRIT of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum for Telephonic Court Appearance for Plaintiff, KEVIN D. BRYANT CDCR # D-56620, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/23/13: Appearance is required for a telephonic conference set for April 30, 2013 at 9:30 AM. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel 52 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/6/2013. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/30/2013 granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (Amended Complaint due by 2/19/2013).(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Discharging Order to Show Cause 45 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/24/13. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER RE: Defendants' Ex Parte Application to Modify Briefing Schedule 46 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/18/13: Defendants' joint reply brief due no later than January 25, 2013; The Court will instruct the Clerk of Court to file and docket Plaintiff's opposition papers. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court's Order re filing opposition to defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Plaintiff's response is due by 1/15/2013. Order signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/2/2013. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER to VACATE Hearing and to Set Briefing Schedule 39 , 41 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/30/12. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion to Remand 19 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/27/2012. (Hall, S)
|
|
Filing
32
AMENDED ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to Permit Plaintiff, Kevin Darnell Bryant, to Appear Via Telephone, #D-56620, on 11/29/2012 at 09:30 AM (PST), signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/20/2012. (Hall, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
