Harris v. Hasky et al
| Eddie A Harris |
| Hasky, A. Beltran and K. Turner |
| 1:2012cv01426 |
| August 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER Denying Motion For Order Requiring Defendants To File Answer And Denying Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Doc. 35 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/17/2015. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to 29 Motion for Summary Judgment,signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 05/12/14. ( 30)Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Disregarding 27 Opposition to Stricken Motion to Dismiss signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 04/22/2014. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER STRIKING 21 Unenumerated Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss and Requiring Defendants to File Responsive Pleading or Motion within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 04/8/14. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to Either Withdraw Amended Complaint and Notify Court of Willingness to Proceed Only Against Defendants Hasky and Beltran OR File Second Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/29/2013. (Thirty Day Deadline.) (Marrujo, C)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
