Spector v. California Department of Corrections et al
Phillip Spector |
California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison, California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility, Corcoran State Prison, Vijendra Kumar, DDS, Robert S. Pringle, DDS, California Department of Corrections and State of California |
1:2012cv01450 |
September 5, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Anthony W. Ishii |
Michael J. Seng |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 Stipulation and ORDER for Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 8/20/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Without Prejudice 6 Plaintiff's Application for Order to Show Cause in re Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/18/2012. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 17 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's Application for Order to Show Cause in re Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 6 be DENIED without prejudice re 6 MOTION for TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER filed by Phillip Spector ; referred to Judge Ishii, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/15/12. Objections to F&R due by 12/3/2012(Martin-Gill, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.