Brown et al v. Fresno Unified School District Educational Facilities Corporation
Plaintiff: Sheila Brown and Horace Chester Brown
Defendant: Fresno Unified School District Educational Facilities Corporation
Case Number: 1:2012cv01597
Filed: September 28, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Anthony W. Ishii
Presiding Judge: Sandra M. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER CLOSING CASE in Light of Plaintiff's 14 Rule 41(a) Notice of Dismissal, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 4/1/2013. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
March 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this matter be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and is referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to the findings and recommendations are due within thirty days of service of this order. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 3/6/2013. (Rooney, M)
January 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING plaintiff's first amended complaint for failure to allege facts sufficient to state a claim on which relief may be granted. The Court FURTHER GRANTS plaintiff leave to amend to file a second amended complaint curing the deficie nces identified by the Court. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file his second amended complaint within thirty days of service of this order or face dismissal for failure to state a claim. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/26/2013. (Rooney, M)
October 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING, with leave to amend, plaintiff's complaint for failure to allege facts sufficient to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file an amended complaint within thirty days of service of this order or face dismissal, with prejudice. It is FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Dismiss, document 5 , is dismissed. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/30/2012. (Rooney, M)
October 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER GRANTING plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, document 2 , but does not direct service until the Court's screening order has been issued; order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/2/2012. (Rooney, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown et al v. Fresno Unified School District Educational Facilities Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Horace Chester Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fresno Unified School District Educational Facilities Corporation
Represented By: Michael Gary Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?