Garland v. Stanley, et al.
| Shaun Darnell Garland |
| C. Stanley, Nickell and Lindsey |
| 1:2012cv01755 |
| October 29, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Grant Defendants' 25 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/30/15. Referred to Judge Ishii; 14-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER Denying Motion For Reconsideration (ECF No. 41 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/19/2015. Plaintiffs Response (ECF No. 41 ), which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration, is HEREBY DENIED.(Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion To Compel Discovery (ECF No. 39 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/13/2015. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER (1) Denying Plaintiff's Motion To Compel (ECF No. 22 ), (2) Granting In Part Plaintiff's Motion For Leave To Reopen Discovery (ECF No. 28 ); And (3) Granting Plaintiff's Motion For Extension Of Time (ECF No. 28 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/2/2015. (Filings Deadline: 2/18/2015, Opposition Deadline: 2/25/2015) (Fahrney, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
