Anderson v. Brown et al
| Dion Anderson |
| Edmond G. Brown, California State Legislature, Debra Bowen, John Chiang, Kamala D. Harris and California Superior Courts |
| 1:2012cv01839 |
| November 5, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Recusal and Motion to Vacate All Orders Issued 39 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 4/22/15. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Denying 36 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/11/15. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
37
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION Regarding 25 First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 3/11/15. Referred to Judge Ishii; 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER Denying 33 Motion for Appointment of Counsel; ORDER Striking 34 Motion for Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 02/02/15. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER DENYING as MOOT 23 Motion to Stay; ORDER DIRECTING Clerk of Court to Terminate Petition for Writ of Mandamus 30 signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/25/2014. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Denying 11 Motion for Appointment of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/13/13. (Gonzalez, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
