Calhoun v. Hartley
Plaintiff: Stanley Calhoun
Defendant: James Hartley
Case Number: 1:2012cv02007
Filed: December 10, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: Dennis L. Beck
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER of DISMISSAL, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/29/14: This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. The mediator shall retain jurisdiction for purposes of enforcement of the terms of the settlement agreement between the parties. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER & WRIT of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum for Stanley Calhoun, CDCR #B-78165 on October 28, 2014 at 8:45 a.m., before Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini at the U.S. District Court, 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, Courtroom #24, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 9/29/14. (Hellings, J)
August 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER referring action for Settlement Conference to Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/21/2014. (Lundstrom, T)
June 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Ex Parte Request to Extend Discovery Deadline 34 , signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 6/18/14: Discovery Deadline now set for August 4, 2014; Dispositive Motion Deadline shall remain September 2, 2014. (Hellings, J)
February 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 DISCOVERY and SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 2/4/14: Initial Disclosures - 3/21/2014, Unenumerated Rule 12(b) Motions - 5/5/2014, Deadline to Amend Pleadings - 6/4/2014, Discovery Cut-Off - 7/3/2014, Dispositive Motions - 9/2/2014. (Hellings, J)
January 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and GRANTING Defendant's Motion to Dismiss IN PART 23 , signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/10/14: Defendant is ORDERED to file a responsive pleading within thirty (30) days of the date of service of this order. (Hellings, J)
November 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss, filed on August 8, 2013, be GRANTED IN PART as to Plaintiff's Claim for Injunctive Relief. It is DENIED on all other grounds ; referred to Judge Ishii, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 11/21/13. Objections to F&R due by 12/26/2013 (Martin-Gill, S)
May 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER denying 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 5/2/2013. (Lundstrom, T)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calhoun v. Hartley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Hartley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stanley Calhoun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?