Patten v. Walker et al
Jason Patten |
J. Walker, Robert Justice, Donald C. Moody, Dean J. Robinson, Mark M. Sakai, R. Rivera, Don Goshgarian, Randi Blashaw, J. Nay and Bryan Quattlebaum |
1:2013cv00346 |
March 11, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Gary S. Austin |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER DISMISSING CASE for Failure to Prosecute, signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 11/16/16. CASE CLOSED (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 31 ORDER on REMAND signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 10/11/2016. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 25 ORDER DENYING 24 Motion to Proceed IFP ON APPEAL, signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 09/14/2015. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 23 ORDER Regarding Motion at Docket 22 , signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/4/15: The Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal at Docket 22 is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, with a copy of this Order, to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for such further consideration as that court may deem appropriate. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 16 DISMISSAL ORDER signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 06/08/2015. Amended Complaint and Filing Fee due by 7/15/2015. (Flores, E) |
Filing 12 ORDER DENYING 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/8/2013. (Marrujo, C) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.