Arellano v. Benov
Petitioner:
Juan Luis Arellano
Respondent:
Michael L. Benov
Case Number:
1:2013cv00558
Filed:
April 18, 2013
Court:
California Eastern District Court
Office:
Fresno Office
County:
Kern
Presiding Judge:
Anthony W. Ishii
Referring Judge:
Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit:
General
Cause of Action:
28:2241
Jury Demanded By:
None
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
March 27, 2014 | 19 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Arellano v. Benov | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Michael L. Benov | |
Represented By: | Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel |
Represented By: | Dale Patrick |
Represented By: | Samantha Sue Spangler |
Represented By: | Melanie Leigh Alsworth, GOVT |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Juan Luis Arellano | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.