Henley v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.
| Robert Henley |
| Lowe's HIW, Inc. |
| 1:2013cv00684 |
| May 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER TO DISMISS AND CLOSE ACTION signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/21/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER VACATING Order RE Joint Status Report. It is hereby ordered that the Court's 2/21/2014 Order Re Joint Status report is VACATED. The Court's 2/21/2014 Order After Settlement shall remain in effect and the parties shall file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety no later than 4/4/40214. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/24/2014. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/21/2014. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING 17 Lowe's Request to Seal Documents signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/6/2014. This Court FURTHER ORDERS defendant Lowe's, no later than February 7, 2014, to submit to the Court unredacted documents filed under seal. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/22/2013. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER APPROVING the parties' stipulation for the filing of plaintiff's first amended complaint. Plaintiff's first amended complaint is due within seven (7) days of service of this order and defendant's response to same is due within thirty (30) days of service of this order. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/22/2013. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
7
SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed.R.Civ.P 16), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/8/2013. (Initial Disclosures: 9/6/2013, Non-Expert Discovery: 4/2/2014, Expert Disclosure: 3/5/2014, Supplemental Expert Disclosure: 4/18/2014, Expert Discovery: 5/23/2014, Non-Dispositive Motion Filing ddl: 4/2/2014, Dispositive Motion Filing ddl: 5/23/2014, Pretrial Conference set for 8/20/2014, at 08:15 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill., and Jury Trial (5 Days) set for 9/30/2014 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill.) (Gaumnitz, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Henley v. Lowe's HIW, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lowe's HIW, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Emily Burkhardt Vicente |
| Represented By: | Emily L. Aldrich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert Henley | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. F. Smith |
| Represented By: | John Lawrence Migliazzo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
