Smith v. Green et al
Clifford Smith |
Green, Randolph Wilson, III and California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation |
1:2013cv00880 |
June 12, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Fresno |
Barbara A. McAuliffe |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending that Defendants' 24 Motion for Summary Judgment be Granted signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 09/08/2016. Referred to Judge Drozd; Objections to F&R due by 9/26/2016.(Flores, E) |
Filing 30 ORDER Vacating 27 Findings and Recommendations, Regarding Dismissal of Action for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Obey a Court Order; ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Respond to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/27/16. 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 27 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of Action, with Prejudice, for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Obey a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/6/16. Referred to Judge Drozd; 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 26 ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to 24 Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/26/16. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.