Quezada v. Cate et al
Alvaro Quezada |
Matthew Cate, C. Gipson and M. Smith |
1:2013cv00960 |
June 24, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Anthony W. Ishii |
Michael J. Seng |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 87 Motion to Compel Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/21/18. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 80 ORDER re Miscellaneous Filing 79 Notice, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 07/02/2017. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 72 ORDER DENYING as Moot Defendant's 69 Application to Stay the Case; ORDER STAYING Discovery and Dispositive Motion Deadlines, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/13/17. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 70 ORDER GRANTING 64 Motion to Correct Record; ORDER ADOPTING In Part 62 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER ADOPTING In Part 56 Findings and Recommendations; ORDER GRANTING In Part Defendant's 32 Motion for Order Declaring Plaintiff a Vex atious Litigation and Requiring Security; ORDER DECLARING Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant; ORDER GRANTING Leave to File the Lodged First Amended Complaint; ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's Rluipa Claim With Prejudice and First Amendment Claim Without Prejudice; ORDER GRANTING Leave to File an Amended Complaint, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 3/8/17. 45-Day Deadline to file Amended Complaint. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 62 ORDER Granting Motion for Ruling 46 ; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Grant Motion to Amend Complaint; to File the Lodged First Amended Complaint; for Service of Cognizable Claims against Defendant Rabbi Yossi Carron; for Service of Cognizable Claims against Defendant Smith to Answer; and to Dismiss all other Claims with Prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/28/16. Referred to Judge Ishii; 14-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 56 ORDER GRANTING Defendants' 33 Request for Judicial Notice; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Grant Defendants' 32 Motion for Order Declaring Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigant and Requiring Security; Fourteen (14) Day Objection Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/1/2016. Referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii. Objections to F&R due by 11/21/2016. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 45 ORDER Denying 44 Motion to Appoint Counsel; ORDER on Objections to Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/10/16. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting 26 Motion for Protective Order and Request to Stay Discovery signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/18/2016. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny 17 Motion to Dismiss signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 03/15/2016. (Flores, E) |
Filing 24 FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONSTo Deny Defendant's Motion To Dismiss (ECF No. 17 ), Fourteen (14) Day Objection Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/12/2016. F&R's referred to Judge Anthony W. Ishii;Objections to F&R due by 1/29/2016. (Fahrney, E) |
Filing 13 ORDER Adopting 12 Findings and Recommendations for Dismissal of Certain of Plaintiff's Claims and Defendants, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/11/15. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 12 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS for Dismissal of Certain of Plaintiff's Claims and Defendants, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 04/16/15. Referred to Judge Ishii. Fourteen-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.