Demelo v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Luis Demelo |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2013cv01247 |
| August 8, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER REMANDING ACTION for Further Proceedings, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/30/2018: The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action. ( CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Social Security Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/24/2015. This Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's appeal from the administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security be GRANTE D. The Court further ORDERS this case be remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order. The Clerk of this Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff, Luis Demelo, and against Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Commissioner of Social Security. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER for Extension of Time: Based upon the stipulation of the parties (Doc. 29), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his reply brief no later than February 9, 2015. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/1/2014. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER for an Extension of Time of 2 days for Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief: Defendant shall file its opposition no later than November 12, 2014. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 11/12/2014. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER for an Extension of Time of 60 days for Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Opening Brief, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/3/2014. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER EXTENDING Briefing Schedule [Doc. 16]. (1) The parties' stipulation allowing Plaintiff an extension of time to file her opening letter brief is GRANTED. (Doc. 16); (2) Plaintiff shall have up to and including April 15, 2014< /b>, in which to submit her Confidential Letter Brief to Defendant; (3) All other deadlines set forth in the August 13, 2013, Case Management Order are modified accordingly. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/3/2014. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER GRANTING 6 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/12/2013. (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Demelo v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Luis Demelo | |
| Represented By: | Michelle M. Nevarez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Carolyn B. Chen, GOVT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
