Poslof v. CA Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitations, et al
| Lonnie Lee Poslof, Sr. |
| California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, CSATF/SP Corcoran II, Ralph Diaz, Perkins and Santos |
| 1:2013cv01935 |
| November 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Parties' 47 Motions for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/17/2015. Referred to Judge Drozd; Objections to F&R due by 1/22/2016. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
63
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Parties' 47 Motions for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/17/2015. Referred to Judge Drozd; Objections to F&R due by 1/22/2016.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff Thirty Day Extension of Time to File Opposition to Pending Motion for Summary Judgment and DENYING Plaintiff's 49 Request for Continuance Under Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/18/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING 32 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Denying Plaintiff's 30 Request for Federal Protection Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 06/10/2015. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER Denying, without Prejudice, Plaintiff's 40 Motion to Enter Post Filing Evidence of Administrative Remedies signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 05/12/2015. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, Dismissing Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment Claim Of Deliberate Indifference, And Referring Matter Back To Magistrate Judge For Initiation Of Service Of Process (ECF Nos. 28 , 29 ), signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/12/2015. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
32
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Plaintiff's Request for Federal Protection Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/9/2015, referred to Judge Ishii. Objections to F&R Due Within Thirty Days. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
29
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Plaintiff's 28 Third Amended Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/03/2014. Referred to Judge Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 12/29/2014. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER DISCHARGING 23 Order to Show Cause, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/2/2014. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER To SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed For Failure To Prosecute And Comply With The Court's Order (ECF No. 21 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/2/2014. Show Cause Response due by 9/22/2014. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Granting Plaintiff 18 Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint and Denying Plaintiff's Request for Clarification signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 06/09/2014. Amended Complaint due by 7/14/2014. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER Disregarding 12 Motion to Proceed IFP as Moot signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 02/10/2014. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:13-cv-2412 DAD) to Fresno (1:13-cv-1935 SAB) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/25/13.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
