Forte v. Hughes et al
Eugene E. Forte |
Tori Hughes, Chris Schwartz, Adam Christianson, Patterson Police Department and Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department |
1:2013cv01980 |
December 3, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Stanislaus |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Sandra M. Snyder |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 182 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION RECONSIDERATION signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on February 23, 2018. (ECF No. 155) (Munoz, I) |
Filing 174 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on February 21, 2018. (ECF No. 146)(Munoz, I) |
Filing 160 DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on February 13, 2018. (ECF No. 146) (Munoz, I) |
Filing 150 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend 148 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/2/2018. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 141 ORDER re Miscellaneous Ex Parte Applications 123 , 138 , 139 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/20/17. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 135 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER RE Plaintiff's 134 Motion signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/19/2017. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 127 ORDER Setting Conditions of Release, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/3/2017. (Status Conference set for March 6, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. before District Judge Dale A. Drozd)(Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 119 AMENDED 118 REQUEST for U.S. Attorney's Office to Prosecute 117 Criminal Contempt, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/25/2017. (The Court requests that the U.S. Attorney's Office inform the Court by 1/27/2017, whether it will prosecute this case and, if so, confirm attendance at the 2/13/2017 status conference.)(Gaumnitz, R) |
Filing 118 REQUEST for U.S. Attorney's Office to Prosecute 117 Criminal Contempt, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/20/2017. (The Court requests that the U.S. Attorney's Office inform the Court by 1/27/2017, whether it will prosecute this case and, if so, confirm attendance at the 2/17/2017 status conference.)(Gaumnitz, R) |
Filing 116 ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE APPLICATION (Doc. 113) signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on January 17, 2017. (Munoz, I) |
Filing 110 ORDER re Plaintiff's ExParte Application 108 signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/3/17. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 107 PRETRIAL ORDER, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/21/16. Motions in Limine Filing Deadline: January 4, 2017; Motions in Limine Response Deadline: January 11, 2017; Motions in Limine Hearing set for 1/30/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Jury Trial set for 2/7/2017 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 101 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application 99 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/16/2016. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 88 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 87 Motion to Correct Prior Order, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/26/2016. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 86 ORDER RE Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application 85 , signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 07/25/16. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 78 ORDER ORDERING Plaintiff's request for issuance of the subpoena attached as Exhibit 1 to document 76 DENIED without prejudice. The Court FURTHER ORDERS Plaintiff's request for issuance of ten signed, but otherwise blank, subpoenas DENIED, document 77 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 2/16/2016. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 66 ORDER DIRECTING Personal Service of Subpoena Duces Tecum Within Seven Days by United States Marshals Service Without Prepayment of Costs, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/23/2015. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 65 ORDER Granting 62 Plaintiff's ExParte Application Requesting Issuance of Subpoena Duces Tecum to Doctors Medical Center of Modesto, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/14/15. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 56 ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Amend Caption, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 03/02/15. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 53 ORDER Denying Marshal's Motion for Reimbursement for Service of Defendant City of Patterson, re 49 , 50 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 02/11/15. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 47 ORDER SETTING a Mandatory Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/4/2015 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 1 (SMS) before Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/8/2015. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 46 ORDER DISMISSING State Tort Claims (Counts 11, 12, 15, 16, and 17) Against Defendant City of Patterson, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/2/14. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 42 ORDER DISMISSING State Tort Claims (Counts 7-18) 37 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/3/14: Defendants Stanislaus County, Patterson Police Services and the Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department are DISMISSED from this matter. Case remains as to Defendant Timothy Schwartz; Schwartz' answer due within 21 days of service of this order. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 36 ORDER DIRECTING Service by the United States Marshals Service without Prepayment of Costs on Defendants: Stanislaus County Deputy Chris Schwartz; City of Patterson, Patterson Police Services and Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department,signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/20/14. (60-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 35 ORDER STRIKING Findings and Recommendations to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (Doc. 33). Service documents in the above-entitled matter having been docketed by the Court (Doc. 34), the undersigned hereby STRIKES the findings and recommendations recommending that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute (Doc. 33). signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 8/20/2014. (Herman, H) |
Filing 31 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 25 Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Denying Plaintiff's Request to Reopen the Period in which to Object to Findings and Recommendations, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/3/14. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 30 ORDER DENYING plaintiff's Motion to Revoke His Prior Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, document 24 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 7/30/2014. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 15 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that lawsuit proceed following dismissal of certain claims and defendants. These findings and recommendations are referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill with objections due within fourteen days of service. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 6/27/2014. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 14 ORDER DENYING Motion to Appoint Counsel, document 12 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/23/2014. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 11 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 7 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/22/14. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING plaintiff to either file, within thirty days of service of this order, an amended complaint or notify the court of his willingness to proceed only on claims found to be cognizable. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 1/9/2014. (Rooney, M) |
Filing 5 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 3 Motion REQUEST TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 12/18/2013. (Kusamura, W) |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting 2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 12/11/13. (Verduzco, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.