Pappas v. North Kern State Prison et al
| Nicholas Christopher Pappas |
| North Kern State Prison and CDCR |
| 1:2014cv00109 |
| January 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER granting 45 Motion to modify Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 5/4/2016. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
46
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT LOPEZS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 34 FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST REMEDIES BE GRANTED signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/29/2015. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd; Objections to F&R due by 2/1/2016. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER in Response to Plaintiff's 40 Request signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 6/9/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 31 Motion for Preliminary Injunction Relief, For Lack of Jurisdiction, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 2/26/2015. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER DENYING Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief; ORDER DISREGARDING Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend as Moot 18 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/11/14. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Denying Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief re 11 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 09/29/14. (Gonzalez, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
