Akili v. Copenhaver

Akili v. Copenhaver

Petitioner:	Muntu Akili
Respondent:	Paul Copenhaver
Case Number:	1:2014cv00371
Filed:	March 17, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Fresno Office
County:	Merced
Presiding Judge:	Barbara A. McAuliffe
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 12, 2015	Filing 25 ORDER DISCHARGING 15 Order to Show Cause; ORDER GRANTING 22 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition and DISMISSING the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; ORDER DISMISSING Petitioner's Motions AS MOOT (Docs. 3 , 4 , 14 , 18 ); and ORDER DECLINING to Issue a Certificate of Appealability signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/11/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
June 25, 2014	Filing 15 ORDER to Respondent to SHOW CAUSE No Later than Twenty (20) Days After Service of this Order Why Sanctions should not be Imposed for Respondent's Failure to Comply with an Order of the Court; ORDER DIRECTING Respondent to File No Later than Thi rty (30) Days After Service of this Order a Response to the Petition and Opposition or Notice of Non-Opposition to Petitioner's Motions to Expand the Record and for Immediate Release; BRIEFING SCHEDULE; INFORMATIONAL ORDER to Respondent signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/24/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 12, 2015

Filing 25 ORDER DISCHARGING 15 Order to Show Cause; ORDER GRANTING 22 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition and DISMISSING the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; ORDER DISMISSING Petitioner's Motions AS MOOT (Docs. 3 , 4 , 14 , 18 ); and ORDER DECLINING to Issue a Certificate of Appealability signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 2/11/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)

June 25, 2014

Filing 15 ORDER to Respondent to SHOW CAUSE No Later than Twenty (20) Days After Service of this Order Why Sanctions should not be Imposed for Respondent's Failure to Comply with an Order of the Court; ORDER DIRECTING Respondent to File No Later than Thi rty (30) Days After Service of this Order a Response to the Petition and Opposition or Notice of Non-Opposition to Petitioner's Motions to Expand the Record and for Immediate Release; BRIEFING SCHEDULE; INFORMATIONAL ORDER to Respondent signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/24/2014. (Sant Agata, S)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Akili v. Copenhaver
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Muntu Akili
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Paul Copenhaver
Represented By:	Bureau of Prisons Regional Counsel
Represented By:	Christopher Stanton Hales, GOVT
Represented By:	Litigation Coordinator
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?