Moore v. U-Haul Co. of California, et al.
Plaintiff: Ronald Moore
Defendant: U-Haul Co. of California, a California corporation, Lloyd Lister, Clovis Apartment Group, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company and Garold C. Brown Family Limited Partnership, a California limited partnership
Case Number: 1:2014cv00530
Filed: April 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: UnassignedDJ
Presiding Judge: Sandra M. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/28/15. Pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs, and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
December 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 12/4/2014 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint, a copy of which was filed with the Parties' stipulation, within five (5) calendar days of the date this Order is filed. Defendants' response thereto shall be filed within fourteen (14) days after the First Amended Complaint is filed. (Zignago, K.)
June 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/25/2014 ORDERING, parties having so stipulation, U-Haul Co. of California (a California corporation) is DISMISSED from this matter without prejuidce.(Waggoner, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. U-Haul Co. of California, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Moore
Represented By: Tanya E. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U-Haul Co. of California, a California corporation
Represented By: Ryan T. McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lloyd Lister
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clovis Apartment Group, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Garold C. Brown Family Limited Partnership, a California limited partnership
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?