Cato v. Silva et al
Plaintiff: James Cato, Jr.
Defendant: G. Silva and J. A. Dumont
Case Number: 1:2014cv00564
Filed: April 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Stanley A. Boone
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 54 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust the administrative remedies be GRANTED, and this action be DISMISSED for Plaintiff's failure to exhaust the admin istrative remedies as to the claims presented in this action re 48 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT ; Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 48 , filed 02/25/2016 addressing the merits of Plaintiff's claim should be denied as having been rendered moot; referred to Judge O'Neill,signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 05/13/2016. Objections to F&R due by 6/20/2016 (Martin-Gill, S)
May 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 50 Motion for Imposition of Sanctions, both as procedurally defective and for lack of merit, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 05/10/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
February 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER That Inmate James Cato, Jr. is No Longer Needed as a Witness in These Proceedings, and the Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum is Discharged signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/16/2016. (Jessen, A)
January 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER & WRIT Of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum To Transport Inmate James Cato Jr., CDCR# H-35663, DATE: February 16, 2016, TIME: 10:30 a.m., COURTROOM: 9(SAB), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/26/2016. (Fahrney, E)
January 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER Setting Evidentiary Hearing On Issue Of Exhaustion Of Administrative Remedies, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/7/2016.( Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 2/8/2016, Evidentiary Hearing set for 2/17/2016 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone) (Fahrney, E)
January 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and REFERRING Matter Back to Magistrate Judge for Evidentiary Hearing on Issue of Exhaustion 32 , 36 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/6/16. (Hellings, J)
November 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION Regarding Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Relating to Exhaustion of the Administrative Remedies 32 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/20/15: Thirty-Day Objection Deadline. (Hellings, J)
March 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING 25 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Granting Defendant Dumont's 22 Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default, Denying Plaintiff's 24 Motion for Default Judgment as Moot, and Granting Defendant Dumont Thirty Days to Re-File Answer to Complaint signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 03/30/2015. (Flores, E)
March 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 22 Defendant Dumont's Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default be GRANTED, 24 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment be DENIED AS MOOT and Defendant Dumont be Granted the Ability to Re-File Hi s Answer to the Complaint Following Resolution of the Instant Recommendation re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/3/2015. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within twenty (20) days. (Jessen, A)
February 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER STRIKING Defendant Dumont's 21 Answer from the Record as Entry of Default Remains Outstanding signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/5/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
January 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER IMPOSING Entry of Default Against Defendant Dumont, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/29/2015. (Marrujo, C)
January 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER as to why Entry of Default Should not be Entered as to Defendant Dumont signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 01/09/2015. (Flores, E)
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER DIRECTING That Action Proceed Against Defendant Dumont for Retaliation, DISMISSING All Other Claims and Parties, and Referring Matter Back to Magistrate Judge to Initiate Service of Process, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/24/2014. (Marrujo, C)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cato v. Silva et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Cato, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. Silva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. A. Dumont
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?