McColm v. State of California et al
Patricia A. McColm |
State of California, Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, California Correctional Women's Facility, California Correctional Health Care Services, Tim Neal, Pal Virk, R. Mitchell, A. Khoo and A. Gonzalez |
1:2014cv00580 |
April 22, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Madera |
Dennis L. Beck |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 88 ORDER ADOPTING 85 Findings and Recommendations to DENY 83 Plaintiff's Motion Seeking Relief From, or Alterations to, the Judgment, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/18/2020. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 85 ORDER GRANTING 84 Motion to Seal and Directing Clerk of Court to File Medical Records Under Seal as Exhibits; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 83 Plaintiff's Motion Seeking Relief From, or Alterations to, the Judgment, be DENIED re 63 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/16/2020. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 75 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Case for Failure to State Claim, Failure to Comply with Court Orders, and Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 06/12/2019. Referred to Judge O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 7/1/2019.(Flores, E) |
Filing 71 ORDER VACATING 64 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Case for Failure to State a Claim, Failure to Comply with Court Orders, and Failure to Prosecute; ORDER PERMITTING Plaintiff to Submit Renewed Motion for Recruitment of Counsel; Thirty (30) Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/10/2018. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 69 ORDER GRANTING Request to File Document Under Seal 68 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 9/19/2018. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 64 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Case for Failure to State Claim, Failure to Comply With Court Orders, and Failure to Prosecute 63 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 8/8/2018: 14-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 53 ORDER ADOPTING 47 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss with Prejudice all Claims Except Plaintiff's ADA Claims, First Amendment Claims for Retaliation, and Access to Courts, and Eighth Amendment Claims for Excessive Force and Failure to Protect; and Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Failure to state a Claim signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 02/22/2018. Amended Complaint due by 3/27/2018.(Flores, E) |
Filing 41 ORDER DENYING 40 Motion for Reconsideration, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 02/06/2017. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 37 ORDER Granting 35 Motion to File Documents Under Seal, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/19/17. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 32 ORDER DENYING Motion to Appoint Counsel 31 , signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/20/16: Motion is DENIED without prejudice. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 30 ORDER GRANTING Motion at Docket 28, signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/9/16. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 27 ORDER Granting 25 Motion to File Under Seal, signed by District Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 5/11/16. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING 15 Motion to File Medical Records attached as Exhibits to the Motion at Docket 14 Under Seal, signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 03/19/2015. (Martin-Gill, S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.