Sidlow et al v. Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc.
| Faith Sidlow and Richard Nitido |
| Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. |
| 1:2014cv00657 |
| May 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| UnassignedDJ |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER Granting 64 Motion for Summary Judgment, Denying Motion to Defer Consideration of Motion 66 , and Directing Clerk of Court to Close Case, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/5/16. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER re Request to Seal Documents signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/2/16, ORDERING that the document attached as Exhibit P to Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendant's motion for summary judgment be filed under seal. (ECF No. 68, Ex. P.)(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/21/16: Plaintiffs' request to seal Exhibit P to its opposition 69 is hereby denied, and Plaintiffs are instructed to refile their request to seal pursuant to the requirements of Local Rule 141(b) within 14 days of the entry of this Order.(Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 55 Motion to Compel Additional Discovery and VACATING October 28, 2015 Hearing, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/26/2015. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 52 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL; DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND A PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND VACATING THE AUGUST 5, 2015 HEARING. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/30/2015. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
51
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/19/2015. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER Granting in Part 40 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/11/2015. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Request to Cancel Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/6/2015. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
35
PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/8/15 ORDERING that all discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed by 8/17/2015. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/15/2015. All dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than 2/11/2016. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 5/19/2016 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. The parties shall file, not later than 5/12/2016, a Joint Final Pretrial Conference Statement. A Jury Trial is SET for 7/18/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. The parties estimate a trial le ngth of five to six (5-6) days. A Settlement Conference is SET for 5/14/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Confidential settlement conference statements to be submitted not later than 5/7/2015 to saborders@caed.uscourts.gov. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/6/15 GRANTING Defendant's MOTION for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiffs' disparate treatment claims with leave to amend 9 . Plaintiffs have 30 days from the date on which this Order is filed to file an amended complaint. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
