CalMat Co. v. KAD Paving Company et al
| CalMat Co. |
| Donald J. Wheeler, Jr., KAD Paving Company, Hugo Alonso, Inc. and Hudson Insurance Company |
| 1:2014cv00677 |
| May 7, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| UnassignedDJ |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Miller Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1352 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Administratively Close Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/17/14. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT. By no later than July 24, 2014, the parties are to file appropriate pleadings to dismiss or conclude this action in its entirety, or to show good cause why the action has not been dismissed. The Court VACATES all pending matte rs and dates. The parties are cautioned that a failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or any party who violate this order. See Local Rules 160 and 272. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/7/2014. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER EXTENDING time for Defendants, Hugo Alonso, Inc. and Hudson Insurance Company to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint for a period of fifteen (15) days, to and including 6/20/2014. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/9/2014. (Timken, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
