Espinoza v. Diaz
Plaintiff: Isrrael Espinoza
Defendant: A. Diaz
Case Number: 1:2014cv00872
Filed: June 9, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Kern
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Presiding Judge: Jennifer L. Thurston
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING 26 Findings and Recommendations to Grant Defendant's 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER DIRECTING Case Closure by Court Clerk, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/15/16. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
June 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 29 Motion to Vacate Judgment due to Clerical Error signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 06/16/2016. (Flores, E)
November 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/17/2015 recommending that 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment be granted. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 12/21/2015. (Lundstrom, T)
November 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER WITHDRAWING 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS to Grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/10/2015. Seven (7) day defense deadline. (Jessen, A)
September 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Grant Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 11 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 9/25/15. Referred to Judge O'Neill; 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
August 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 20 Motion to Continue Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and DIRECTING Plaintiff to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition Thereto, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 8/20/2015. Thirty Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C)
July 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 AMENDED SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - Notice and Warning of Requirements for Opposing Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/20/2015. (Jessen, A)
July 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER Directing Defendant to Advise whether he desires his Motion to Dismiss be Converted to a Motion for Summary Judgment or Withdrawing his Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/9/15.(10-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
November 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 SECOND INFORMATIONAL ORDER - NOTICE AND WARNING OF REQUIREMENTS FOR OPPOSING DEFENDANT'S 11 MOTION to DISMISS signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/6/2014. (Filing Deadline: 12/1/2014).(Lundstrom, T)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Espinoza v. Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Isrrael Espinoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: A. Diaz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?