Solis v. County of Stanislaus et al
| Javier Solis |
| County of Stanislaus, Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department, Ceres Police Department, Officer Perry and Quiroz |
| 1:2014cv00937 |
| June 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanislaus |
| UnassignedDJ |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
Stipulation and ORDER for DISMISSAL by Operation of Law, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/9/17. CASE CLOSED.(Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations Regarding Dismissal of Defendants Albonetti and King for Failure to Effectuate Service of Process, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/21/16. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
37
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Dismissal of Defendants Albonetti and King for Failure to Effectutate Service of Process, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 6/3/16. Referred to Judge Drozd; 14-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
36
DISCOVERY and SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/22/16. Deadline to Amend Pleadings: August 22, 2016, Discovery Deadline: December 22, 2016, Dispositive Motion Deadline: February 22, 2017. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS, ALBONETTI AND KING SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FROM THIS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/22/2016. Show Cause Response due by 5/25/2016.(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Directing Service By The United States Marshal Without Prepayment Of Costs, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/7/2016. (Filing Deadline: 1/20/2016) (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 10/26/2015 ADOPTING 13 Findings and Recommendations; ORDERING that this action proceed on 11 Third Amended Complaint against Defendants Griebel and Quiroz, in their individual capacities, for exces sive force in violation of the Fourth Amendment and against Defendants Niewenhuis, King and Albonetti, in their individual capacities, for failure to intercede; DISMISSING the plaintiff's claims against said defendants in their official capacities; GRANTING the plaintiff thirty days to file a Fourth Amended Complaint joining the City of Ceres as a defendant. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER Directing Clerk of Court to Assign a District Judge to this Action; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Dismissal of Certain Claims and Defendants re 11 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/2/15. This Case is Assigned to Senior Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. The New Case Number is: 1:14-cv-00937-WBS-BAM. Fourteen-Day Deadline. Referred to Judge Shubb.(Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
10
SCREENING ORDER Dismissing 9 Second Amended Complaint with Leave to Amend, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/27/15. Amended Complaint Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
8
SCREENING ORDER Dismissing First Amended Complaint with Leave to Amend, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/15/14. 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
6
Screening ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 1). Thirty days plaintiff shall file first amended complaint. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/10/2014. (Herman, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
