Francisco Nieves Reyes v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Francisco Nieves Reyes
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Caremark RX LLC
Case Number: 1:2014cv00964
Filed: June 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Stanislaus
Presiding Judge: UnassignedDJ
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Seng
Nature of Suit: Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER and FINAL JUDGMENT GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/28/16. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
June 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER REQUIRING Defendant to Submit Evidence of Compliance With 28 U.S.C. 1715(b), signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/13/16. Filing Deadline: 6/20/2016. (Marrujo, C)
February 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 40 Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. Final Fairness Hearing is set for June 10, 2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/10/2016. (Yu, L)
August 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 Stipulation to Vacate Scheduling Conference In Light Of Tentative Class Action Settlement and Order Thereon;signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 08/11/2015. (Yu, L)
June 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 Stipulation Re: Continuance of Scheduling Conference Pending Mediation and Order Thereon. The Scheduling Conference is now set for August 28, 2015 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 06/09/2015. (Yu, L)
February 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 Stipulation Re: Modification of Litigation Schedule and Order Thereon signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/20/2015. (Yu, L)
August 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DENYING 5 Motion to Remand and 19 Motion to File a Sur-Reply, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 08/08/2014. (Yu, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Francisco Nieves Reyes v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Represented By: Douglas Roger Hart
Represented By: Francis S. Lam
Represented By: Jennifer B Zargarof
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Caremark RX LLC
Represented By: Douglas Roger Hart
Represented By: Francis S. Lam
Represented By: Jennifer B Zargarof
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francisco Nieves Reyes
Represented By: Gregory N. Karasik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?