Cranford v. Dharleen et al
| Archie Cranford |
| Dharleen and Narceda |
| 1:2014cv00995 |
| June 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION for Failure to Obey a Court 13 Order and Failure to State a Claim signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/02/2015. CASE CLOSED.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
13
SCREENING ORDER DISMISSING plaintiff's first amended complaint, document 8 , with leave to amend. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint in compliance with this order or face dismissal for failure to obey a court order and for failure to state a claim. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/14/2015. (Rooney, M)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Discovery as Premature signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/21/2014. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 6 Motion for Leave to Amend his Complaint as Unnecessary signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 08/13/2014. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Granting Application To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 7 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/16/2014. (Fahrney, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
