Galzinski v. Beard et al
| Harald Mark Galzinski |
| Michael Baldwin, K. Pool, J.D. Lazano, Joel Martinez, Heidi M. Lackner, Jeffery Beard and B. Lacey |
| 1:2014cv01158 |
| July 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Tuolumne |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Jennifer L. Thurston |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
NOTICE and ORDER Finding That Plaintiff is Not Entitled to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/2/14. (cc Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.)(Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS To Dismiss Amended Complaint With Prejudice For Failure/Inablility To State A Claim (Docs. 12 , 13 ), Strike Per 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 11/4/2014. CASE CLOSED. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
13
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss 12 Amended Complaint With Prejudice for Failure/Inability to State a Claim, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 10/2/2014, referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R Due Within Thirty Days. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:14-cv-1640 KJM AC) to Fresno (1:14-cv-1158 JLT) signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/23/14. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
