Hypolite v. Zariora et al
| Avery L. Hypolite |
| R. Zamora and N. Schultz |
| 1:2014cv01199 |
| July 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
122
ORDER DENYING 121 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of Bill of Costs Taxed Against Him signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 8/31/2018. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
117
ORDER That Inmate Jesse Washington is No Longer Needed as a Witness in There Proceedings, and The Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum is Discharged, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/24/17.(Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO AMEND PRETRIAL ORDER AND WITNESS LIST (Doc. 106) signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on May 18, 2017. (Munoz, I)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER OVERRULING 97 Defendant's Objection to the Court's May 5, 2017, Order Granting Attendance of Inmate Witnesses signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/8/2017. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to Transport Witness Jesse Washington, CDCR# D-23593, for Jury Trial on May 23, 2017 at 8:00 a.m., signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 05/05/2017. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 89 Motion for Order Directing the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to Allow Inmate Witness to Appear in Prison Khakis During Trial signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 05/02/2017. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER Regarding Defendant's 83 Objections to Pretrial Order signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/25/2017. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Further Documentation as to his Request for Inmate Witnesses signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/24/2017. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER Regarding Plaintiff's 66 Motion for Incarcerated Witnesses, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/30/17. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Ninth Motion for Appointment of Counsel 76 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/28/17. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER DISCHARGING 67 Order to Show Cause Issued February 23, 2017, and Directing Defendant to File the Pretrial Statement and Opposition, If Any, to Plaintiff's Motion for Incarcerated Witnesses Within Fifteen Days of Date of Service of This Order, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 3/7/17. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER REQUIRING Plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE Within Fifteen Days Why Sanctions Should Not be Imposed for Failure to Comply With the Court's Scheduling Order, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/23/17. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 63 , 64 , Motions for Reconsideration of the Court's August 17, 2016, Order Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/6/17. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Eighth 61 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/14/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER DENYING, Without Prejudice, 54 Plaintiff's Seventh Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/1/2016. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER GRANTING Defendant's Motion to Compel, and Directing Plaintiff to File a Response and Produce Documents Within Thirty Days From the Date of Service fo This Order 43 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/20/16. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Denying 48 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/27/2016. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 38 Motion to Compel Discovery, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/17/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's Fifth Motion for Appointment of Counsel 39 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/21/16: Motion is DENIED without prejudice. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER ADOPTING 28 Findings and Recommendation, Dismissing Defendant Schultz, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4(M) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; N. Schultz (Correctional Officer) terminated, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 04/11/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER DENYING Plainitiff's Fourth 33 Motion for Appoint Counsel, without prejudice, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/11/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 30 Motion to Compel ;ORDERED that in the interest of justice, the Court will grant Plaintiff thirty additional days from the date of service of this order to provide additional information, if possible, to assist in the identification of Defendant Schultz, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/8/2015. (30-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's THIRD Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (ECF No. 26 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/10/2015. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Entry of Default signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/17/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER DENYING 13 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/19/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER DENYING 3 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/1/2014. (Sant Agata, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
