Linthecome v. Alfaro et al
| Marcus Leon Linthecome |
| Sandra Alfaro, NKSP Mailroom Staff, NKSP Appeals Coordinators, NKSP Case Records Staff and NKSP Medical Staff |
| 1:2014cv01438 |
| September 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kern |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Action for Failure to Provide a Current Address, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/16/15. Referred to Judge O'Neill; 14-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendations to Deny Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Require Payment of Filing Fees in Full within Twenty-One Days, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/24/15. (Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing
9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Plaintiff's In Forma Pauperis 7 be DENIED; Plaintiff should be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full within twenty-one days of adoption of these F&R's; Plaintiff fails to pay &# 036;400.00 in full within twenty-one days, action will be DISMISSED re 7 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Marcus Leon Linthecome ; referred to Judge O'Neill,signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 04/01/2015. (14-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
