Cohea v. Tucker et al
| Danny James Cohea |
| H. Tucker, T. Cano, S. Reeves, R. M. Martinez, V. O'Shaughnessy, W. Rasley, J. Callow, N. Comaites, R. S. Lambert and W. Barberick |
| 1:2014cv01544 |
| October 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Dennis L. Beck |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
ORDER Denying Reconsideration (Motion At Docket 15 ), signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/30/2015. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/10/15. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Denying Reconsideration (Motion At Docket 9 ), signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 7/16/2015. The Court extends the time within which Cohea must pay the filing fee through and including August 7, 2015. In all other respects the order Revoking In Forma Pauperis Status at Docket 8 is affirmed. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER VACATING Order Granting In Forma Pauperis, signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 6/19/15: No later than July 10, 2015, Plaintiff must remit to the Clerk of the Court the full amount of the unpaid filing fee or this matter will be dismissed without further notice. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
