Simpson v. Hickman, et al
| Jason Royce Simpson |
| C. Terhune, Roderick Hickman and G Lewis |
| 1:2014cv01763 |
| October 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Sacramento |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/13/2015. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER to Dismiss Roderick Hickman as Defendant signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 01/08/2015. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
12
Order GRANTING extension of time, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/21/2014. (Defendant's Response to Complaint filed by 1/9/2015)(Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER RELATING Action and ASSIGNING to Docket of District Judge Lawrence L. O'Neill (The new case number is 1:14-cv-01763-LJO-SAB); ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk to Issue Initial Case Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/12/2014. (Marrujo, C)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:14-cv-2515 DAD) to Fresno (1:14-cv-1763 SAB) signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/7/14. Defendants shall, on or before November 24, 2014, file and serve their response to the complaint. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
