Palomo v. City of Sanger et al
Plaintiff: Ellen Palomo
Defendant: City of Sanger, Joshua Mitchell and Brian Haddix
Case Number: 1:2014cv01769
Filed: November 11, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Fresno
Presiding Judge: UnassignedDJ
Presiding Judge: Stanley A. Boone
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/21/2017 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice as to all parties and all causes of action. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
November 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 42 STIPULATION and ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUTOFF. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties herein, through their respective attorneys of record, that the discovery period for this matter is hereby extended from November 7, 2016 to December 16, 2016 for the sole purpose of completing the depositions of only the following individuals: Deborah Sultan, Brian Haddix, Joshua Mitchell, Dan Spears, Adrian Neri, Rolinda Hernandez, Silver Rodriguez, Alma Colado, Rebecca Hernandez and Yolanda Arce. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/8/2016. (Hernandez, M)
September 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/24/2015 GRANTING 14 Motion to Dismiss as to the plaintiff's sub-claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C §§ 1981 and 1982, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and claims against Defendants Mitchell and Haddix; DENYING 14 Motion to Dismiss as to the plaintiff's claims pursuant to Title VII and FEHA. (Michel, G.)
February 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/18/15 ORDERING that good cause exists for the continuing of the filing of the parties' Joint Scheduling Conference Report until thirty (30) days after the Court issues an order on Defendants' currently pending Motion to Dismiss 14 & 15 .(Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Palomo v. City of Sanger et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Sanger
Represented By: Jenell Arlene VanBindsbergen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joshua Mitchell
Represented By: Jenell Arlene VanBindsbergen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Haddix
Represented By: Jenell Arlene VanBindsbergen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ellen Palomo
Represented By: Barry M. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?