Johnson v. Cate, et al
| Gregory David Johnson |
| M Cate and J. Hartley |
| 1:2014cv01771 |
| October 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Sacramento |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE re 22 signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/10/2015. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
21
Findings and Recommendations recommending Granting Defendants' 14 Motion to Dismiss, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/19/2015. Motion referred to Judge O' Neill. Objections to F&R due by 6/3/2015. (Rosales, O)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 25, 2015 HEARING. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/23/2015. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
13
Order GRANTING extension of time, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/21/2014. (Defendants Response to Complaint filed by 1/9/2015) (Figueroa, O)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER approving 4 Stipulation and granting Defendants and extension of time to respond to complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/13/2014. (Response due by 11/24/2014).(Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:14-cv-2514 CKD) to Fresno (1:14-cv-1771 SKO) signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/12/14. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
