Coates et al v. Singh et al
Plaintiff: Starshene Coates and Project Sentinel
Defendant: Anil Singh and Roselyn Singh
Case Number: 1:2014cv01910
Filed: December 2, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Fresno Office
County: Stanislaus
Presiding Judge: Lawrence J. O'Neill
Presiding Judge: Sheila K. Oberto
Nature of Suit: Housing/Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER DISMISSING ACTION, signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/13/16: This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, subject to the terms of the settlement agreement. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
August 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 59 JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER to EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING DISMISSAL. The parties shall have until September 14, 2016, to file their dismissal documents. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 8/28/2016. (Timken, A)
March 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER GRANTING Parties' Stipulated Request to Continue Trial and Pre-Trial Conference. The pretrial conference is continued to June 30, 2016, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7; and the trial is continued to August 30, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 7. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/2/2016. (Timken, A)
February 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER assigning Action to U.S. Magistrate Judge for all purposes pursuant to the consent of all parties signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/26/2016. The new case number is 1:14-cv-01910-SKO.(Lundstrom, T)
January 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 46 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER RE Defendants' 35 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 1/11/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
December 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 40 JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on December 15, 2015., 35 MOTION for JUDGMENT currently set for 12/29/2015 has been CONTINUED to 1/12/2016 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LJO) before District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. (Munoz, I)
November 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER APPROVING Stipulation re Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. The hearing set for 11/18/2015, is VACATED. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/10/2015. (Timken, A)
September 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER CONTINUING Non-Expert Discovery Deadline. The non-expert discovery deadline in this matter shall be continued from September 30, 2015, to October 30, 2015. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/11/2015. (Timken, A)
July 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 Order Continuing Settlement Conference. The Settlement Conference is now set for September 18, 2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 07/13/2015. (Yu, L)
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER on Parties' Stipulated Request for the Issuance of a Protective Order. On May 18, 2015, the parties filed a stipulated request for a protective order. (Doc. 18.) The court enters the Protective Order set forth in the parties stipulation. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/19/2015. (Timken, A)
April 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER re PARTIES' DISCOVERY DISPUTE; FURTHER INFORMAL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCE SET FOR 6/29/2015. By no later than 6/10/2015, the parties are to meet and confer regarding the remaining issues as discussed. A further informal telephonic Discovery D ispute is SET for 6/29/2015, at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties shall coordinate one conference call to the court at the date and time for the conference. On or before 6/19/2015, the parties shall submit, via email to skoorders@caed.uscourts.gov, informal 2-3 page letter briefs setting forth the result of their meet and confer discussions as well as their respective positions on any remaining discovery disputes. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/29/2015. (Timken, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coates et al v. Singh et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Starshene Coates
Represented By: Liza Cristol-Deman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Project Sentinel
Represented By: Liza Cristol-Deman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anil Singh
Represented By: Steven Ralph Stoker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roselyn Singh
Represented By: Steven Ralph Stoker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?