White v. Sherman et al
De'Wann White |
Stu Sherman, V. Ramirez, J. Collins, C. G. Beltran, J. Davis and V. Hampson |
1:2014cv01971 |
December 11, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kings |
Dennis L. Beck |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT without prejudice signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 2/8/2016. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 22 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 11/6/2015. Third Amended Complaint due by 1/8/2016.(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 21 ORDER RE: Filing Fee signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 11/5/2015. (Filing Deadline set for 1/8/2016 for Plaintiff to either pay filing fee in full or file a Declaration under penalty of perjury).(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 19 ORDER regarding Filing Fee signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 9/14/15. (Motion for IFP or Filing Fee due by 10/23/2015).(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 15 ORDER DENYING 13 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 7/28/2015. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 11 ORDER Dismissing First Amended Complaint, signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 07/7/15. ( Second Amended Complaint due by 8/14/2015) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 9 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO AMEND signed by Chief Judge Ralph R. Beistline on 5/1/2015. Amended Complaint due by 6/12/2015.(Lundstrom, T) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.