Howard Sipe et al v. King et al
| Howard Sipe |
| Audrey King, Cliff Allenby, Tom Voss and Pam Ahlan |
| 1:2014cv02016 |
| December 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Dismiss Action without Prejudice for Failure to Submit Filing Fee or Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Failure to Obey a Court Order, and Failure to Prosecute; Fourteen (14) Day Objection Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/27/2015. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill. Objections to F&R due by 5/14/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
18
FINDINGS And RECOMMENDATIONS To: (1)Dismiss Complaint For Failure To State A Claim, (2) Direct Clerk's Office To Send Habeas Petition Form, And (3) Require Plaintiff To File Habeas Petition Or Notice Of Voluntary Dismissal Within Thirty Days (ECF No. 1 ), Fourteen (14) Day Objection Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/10/2015. F&R's referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R due by 2/27/2015. (Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Eastern District of California. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 12/17/14. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2014) [Transferred from cand on 12/19/2014.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
