Neely v. Briggs et al
Charles Albert Neely |
R. L. Briggs, D. Artis and J.W. Moss |
1:2015cv00197 |
February 5, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kern |
Stanley A. Boone |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Defendant's 28 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT be Granted, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/6/17. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 36 ORDER Striking Plaintiff's Response and Objections to Defendant's Answer to the Second Amended Complaint 34 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/29/16. (Hellings, J) |
Filing 26 ORDER Adopting Findings and Recommendation 24 , Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and Directing Defendant to File a Further Response to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/11/16. 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 24 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION Recommending Defendant's 19 Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint be Denied, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/1/16. Referred to Judge O'Neill; 30-Day Deadline. (Verduzco, M) |
Filing 4 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to Eastern District of CA. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/3/15. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2015) [Transferred from cand on 2/5/2015.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.