Sullivan v. Biter et al
Michael John Sullivan |
M. D. Biter, Matthew Cates, J. Clark Kelson, D. Foston, G. Jaime, R. Grissom, C. Sorenson, B. Daveiga, P. Lee, J. Castro and J. Willaims |
1:2015cv00243 |
February 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Fresno Office |
Kern |
Gary S. Austin |
Lawrence J. O'Neill |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 117 ORDER ADOPTING Findings and Recommendations 102 and GRANTING Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 90 signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/29/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 114 ORDER GRANTING 113 Plaintiff's Sixth Motion for Extension of Time to File Objections, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/16/2021. Objections to F&R Due Within Thirty-Days. (Maldonado, C) |
Filing 102 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding 90 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment re 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/19/2021. Referred to Judge Drozd; Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Rivera, O) |
Filing 89 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's 88 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Dispositive Motion, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/14/2020. (Dispositive Motions filed by 6/5/2020). (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 83 ORDER GRANTING 62 Motion to Compel; ORDER GRANTING 63 Motion to Modify Discovery and Scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/5/2019. (Deadline for Discovery: 02/21/2020; Deadline for Dispositive Motions: 04/21/2020; Deposition: 70-Day Deadline; Response to Interrogatories: 30-Day Deadline; Request for Production: 60-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 81 ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 80 Motion for a Fifth Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Deposition and Discovery Responses, and Denying, Without Prejudice, Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/28/19. Seven Day Deadline. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 79 ORDER DENYING 77 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Proceedings; ORDER GRANTING an Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Deposition and Discovery Responses; ORDER Directing Clerk to Update Plaintif f's Address to ID#CC19LM562, Martinez Detention Facility, 1000 Warden Street, Martinez, CA 94553; and ORDER Directing Clerk to Send Plaintiff a Copy of ECF 62 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/1/2019. Opposition to Motion to Compel due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 70 ORDER Directing Defendant to File a Response to 69 Plaintiff's Motion for a Third Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Plaintiff's Deposition and Discovery Responses signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/23/2019. Response due within fourteen (14) days. (Jessen, A) |
Filing 67 ORDER GRAANTING Plaintiff's Motion for Second Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Deposition and Denying, without prejudice, Plaintiff's Request for Appointment of Counsel 62 and 66 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/18/19. (Case Management Deadline: 30-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 59 ORDER Granting Defendant's Request for an Extension of Time to File an Answer signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 08/13/2018. Answer due 08/21/2018.(Flores, E) |
Filing 57 ORDER REQUIRING Defendant to File an Answer On OR Before August 14, 2018, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/1/18. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 56 ORDER Adopting 54 Findings and Recommendations, Denying Defendant's 43 Motion to Dismiss, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/30/18. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 55 ORDER REGARDING Plaintiff's Notice of Change of Address; ORDER DENYING 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel, without Prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/11/2018. (Sant Agata, S) |
Filing 54 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) be denied, in its entirety re 43 MOTION to DISMISS ; referred to Judge Drozd,signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 04/25/18. Objections to F&R 30-Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 36 ORDER ADOPTING 28 Findings and Recommendations and Dismissing Certain Claims and Defendants, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/28/17. (Marrujo, C) |
Filing 28 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED AND THAT THIS ACTION PROCEED AGAINST DEFENDANT M. D. BITER FOR UNCONSTITUTIONAL CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/17/2016. Referred to Judge Dale A Drozd; Objections to F&R due by 12/5/2016. (Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 24 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with a Court Order and failure to prosecute re 13 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/31/2016. Show Cause Response due by 10/3/2016.(Lundstrom, T) |
Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's 18 Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint or Notice of Intention to proceed on the claim found to be cognizable ; ORDER DENYING 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 05/25/2016. Amended Complaint due (30)-Day Deadline (Martin-Gill, S) |
Filing 12 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motions For Screening (ECF No. 11 ), signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/22/2016. (Fahrney, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.