Figueroa, et al. v. City of Fresno
| Aurora Figueroa, Lizette Figueroa and Martin Figueroa |
| City of Fresno |
| 1:2015cv00349 |
| March 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER Granting Continuance of Pretrial Conference Date, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/1/2017. (The pretrial conference currently set for 6/26/2017, is continued to 7/5/2017 at 1:30 p.m. before the undersigned. The jury trial remains scheduled for 8/22/2017, at 8:30 a.m. The parties may supplement the lists of proposed motions in limine provided in their pretrial statement by no later than 7/12/2017.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
98
STIPULATION and ORDER Regarding Expert Disclosure and Discovery: (1.) Defendants shall designate and disclose a new expert, to be filed with the Court by no later than June 9, 2017 (per the Courts Order Denying Plaintiffs Request to Seal Documents and Amending Pretrial Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 55)); (2.) Defendants shall serve on Plaintiffs the full report of their new expert by no later than June 9, 2017; (3.) Defendants new expert shall not offer any opinions on issues or topics diffe rent from those disclosed in the July 29, 2016 expert report of Romeo F. Ingresonamely, Defendants new experts opinions will be limited to those regarding (i) entry into the house, (ii) use of the canine, and (iii) whether the use of force was reason able; (4.) Plaintiffs reserve the right to object and/or to serve a rebuttal report should any of Defendants new experts opinions differ from those disclosed in the July 29, 2016 expert report of Romeo F. Ingreso; (5.) Defendants will not provid e their new expert with any of Plaintiffs expert reports until after Defendants new expert has served his new report; (6.) The depositions for both parties expert witnesses will be rescheduled to July 6 and July 7, 2017 at the San Francisco office of Plaintiffs counsel and shall be held in the following order: (i) Defendants expert, (ii) Plaintiffs expert James L. Norris, (iii) Plaintiffs expert D. P. Van Blaricom, and (iv) Plaintiffs expert Ernest Burwell, unless otherwise agreed to by the pa rties in writing; and (7.) Defendants shall reimburse Plaintiffs for reasonable cancelation costs incurred in rescheduling air travel arrangements for Plaintiffs experts. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/16/2017. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER Denying Defendants' 60 Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/10/2017. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER Denying 78 Request to Seal Documents, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/5/2016. (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
71
SCHEDULING ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/16/2016. (The initial pretrial 15 scheduling order is hereby vacated. The court now sets the following schedule- Opposition to Summary Judgment Motion Due: November 29, 2016; Reply to Op position Due: December 13, 2016; Hearing on Motion for Summary Judgment: December 20, 2016; Pretrial Conference set for 3/13/2017, at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd; Jury Trial set for 5/9/2017, at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd.) (Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER DENYING Plaintiffs' Request to Seal Documents and Amending Pretrial Scheduling Order, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/3/16. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER DENYING Defendants' Request to File Sealed Documents (Doc. 51). signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/29/2016. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Regarding Settlement Conference (set for October 3, 2016 at 9:30 am before Judge McAuliffe). PERSONAL Appearance by Plaintiff and Defense Counsel Required. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 7/22/2016. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
45
STIPULATION and ORDER Extending Schedule: Time for non-expert discovery cutoff be moved to June 20, 2016; Time for expert disclosure cutoff be moved to July 22, 2016; and Time for dispositive motion hearing be moved to November 22, 2016. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/12/2016. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Granting 32 Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/21/2016. (1. Plaintiffs shall file their first amended complaint within five (5) days of this order; and 2. Defendant shall respond within fourteen (14) days of the filing of the first amended complaint.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
22
STIPULATION and ORDER 20 for extension of time signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/10/2016. Non-Expert Discovery cut-off date shall be 4/18/2016. Expert Disclosure now due on 6/20/2016. Hearing date for Dispositive Motions shall be 10/13/2016. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
18
Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/20/2015. (Herman, H)
|
|
Filing
8
STIPULATION and ORDER to Reschedule Status Conference: the Telephonic Status Conference regarding assignment to a Sacramento District Judge or Consent is continued from April 2, 2015 to April 30, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. before Judge McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 3/27/2015. (Herman, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
