Lemus et al v. County of Merced et al
| Adolfo Lemus and Noel Lemus |
| County of Merced, Merced County Sherriff's Department and Paul Barile |
| 1:2015cv00359 |
| March 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Merced |
| UnassignedDJ |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/25/19 GRANTING the 65 Motion to Designate Maria O. Lemus as Successor in Interest to Decedent Adolfo Lemus. Maria O. Lemus is hereby designated as the Successor-In-Interest of decedent Plaintiff Adolfo Lemus' surviving interests in the present civil action. She is authorized to direct the litigation, make all substantive decisions, resolve and sign agreements on behalf of decedent Adolfo Lemus. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 2/5/19 GRANTING 68 Motion to Seal Document [65-1]. Plaintiff is further ORDERED to file a redacted version of the same. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
64
STIPULATION and PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/7/2018. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/20/2017 GRANTING 46 Motion to Stay; DENYING as MOOT 46 Motion to Bifurcate so as to permit a stay as to the County's involvement, only and DENIED with respect to any additional claim by the County that trial of this matter be bifurcated so as to adjudicate any claims against Officer Barile first before proceeding to the County's potential liability for misconduct on Officer Barile's part. (Washington, S)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER REQUIRING JOINT STATUS REPORT(Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
43
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 6/29/2016 ORDERING the time to answer the second amended complaint is EXTENDED an additional 30 days to and including 8/1/16, in order for plaintiffs and defendant County of Merced to evaluate and determine the propriety or necessity of a motion or stipulation to stay the action in the district court against County of Merced pending the outcome of the appeal filed by Defendant Barile. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting 34 Ex Parte Application for Extension of time signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/2/16: Defendant County of Merced shall have up to and including July 1, 2016, to file a responsive pleading in this case. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
29
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/19/16 ORDERING that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 25 ) is DENIED in its entirety, including Defendants' alternative request that portions of the SAC be stricken. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/9/2015 GRANTING defendants' 16 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend and DENYING defendants' 16 Motion to Strike as MOOT. No later than 20 days following the date of this Order, plaintiffs may (but are not required to) file an Amended Complaint. If no Amended Complaint is filed, cause of action against defendant Merced County will be dismissed with prejudice and without further notice to parties. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
