Tony Edinbyrd v. Davey et al
| Tony Edinbyrd |
| Dave Davey, R. Whitford, T. Marsh and V. Marmolejo |
| 1:2015cv00529 |
| April 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Barbara A. McAuliffe |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Recommending Dismissal of Action, With Prejudice, for Failure to Prosecute and Failure to Obey a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 10/24/17. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R Due Within 14 Days. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff's to File Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to 25 Motion for Summary Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/11/17. Thirty-Day Deadline. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Discharging 12 Order to Show Cause Why This Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to State a Claim, Failure to Obey a Court Order, and Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 1/13/17. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to State a Claim, Failure to Obey a Court Order, and Failure to Prosecute 11 , signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 12/19/16: 20-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
