Simmons v. Rodriguez, et al.
| Rachel Simmons |
| Correctional Officer Rodriguez, Correctional Officer Hall and Sergeant Luis |
| 1:2015cv00818 |
| May 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| UnassignedDJ |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
ORDER GRANTING Defedants' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 4/17/17. CASE CLOSED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/27/2017 ORDERING that the hearing for the 35 motion for summary judgment is now scheduled to be heard on 4/18/2017 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. Plaintiff's opposition shall be filed no later than 4/4/2017, and the reply brief shall be filed no later than 4/11/2017. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/8/16: Defendants shall have until July 22, 2016 to respond to the amended complaint. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 05/04/16 ORDERING that defendant's 7 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; Plaintiff's wrongful death, negligence, and IIED claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiffs § 1983 claims are DISMISSED WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff's amended complaint, if any, must be filed within 20 days; defendants' responsive pleading is due within 20 days thereafter. (Benson, A)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/23/2016 DISMISSING Defendant Sergeant Luis without prejudice re 20 Request for Dismissal. (Michel, G.)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/2/15 ORDERING the parties' joint motion to extend time for filing the joint status report is granted. The Order Requiring Joint Status Report (ECF No. 14 ) is vacated. The Court will issue a new order requiring the Rule 26(f) discovery plan and joint status report to occur after Defendants' motion to dismiss is resolved and there is an operative complaint. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
