Caetano v. Peery
| Nathan Caetano |
| S. Peery |
| 1:2015cv00832 |
| June 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Lawrence J. O'Neill |
| Michael J. Seng |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER granting 75 , 76 MOTION for EXTENSION OF TIME to File Notice of Appeal signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/1/2018. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER DENYING 78 Petitioner's Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 5/22/2018. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying as moot Motion for Expedited Review 57 and granting Motion for Ruling 68 . FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO: (1) Grant Respondent's Motion to Dismiss 45 ; (2) Dismiss the Petition as Time-Barred; (3) Deny Petitioner's Mot ions for Appointment of Counsel 49 , 50 , 51 , 54 ; (4) Deny Petitioner's Motions for Appointment of Experts 50 , 53 ; (5) Deny Petitioner's Motion for Transcripts 51 ; (6) Deny Petitioner's Motion for Default Judgment 62 ; and (7) Deny Petitioner's Motions for Evidentiary Hearing 66 , 69 signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 1/29/2018. Referred to Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill; Objections to F&R's due within 30-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/10/2017 requiring Respondent to file a response to petition within 60-Days. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER ADOPTING 31 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION; DENYING 20 MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING 40 MOTION REQUESTING RULING; DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 35 MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL AND DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, 36 , 37 , 38 MOTIONS FOR DISCOVERY signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 2/7/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER VACATING 24 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Regarding Respondent's Motion to Dismiss; ORDER GRANTING 27 , 28 , 30 Petitioner's Motion for Ruling on Motion to Dismiss; ORDER DENYING 26 Motion to Appoint Counsel Without Prejudice; AMENDED FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 20 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be DENIED re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/25/2016. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
24
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that 20 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/29/2015. Referred to Judge O'Neill. Objections to F&R due within thirty (30) days. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DENYING 3 , 9 Motions to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 7/2/2015. (Jessen, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Caetano v. Peery | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Nathan Caetano | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: S. Peery | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
