Roach v. Tate Publishing & Enterprises, LLC et al
| Terri Haynes Roach |
| Tate Publishing & Enterprises, LLC, Tate Music Group and Richard Tate |
| 1:2015cv00917 |
| June 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Fresno |
| UnassignedDJ |
| Stanley A. Boone |
| Copyrights |
| 17:101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER Vacating September 14, 2017 Scheduling Conference and Requiring Plaintiff to File a Motion for Default Judgment Within Thirty Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/31/17. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER ADDRESSING STATUS REPORT. As the stay of this action has been lifted, Plaintiff is no longer required to file status reports. In the current status report, Plaintiff indicates that she is working on a motion for default judgment. The Court not es that, although this action was brought against Defendant Tate Music Group, the request for entry of default did not address Defendant Tate Music Group. Plaintiff is advised that she will be required to address Defendant Tate Music Group prior to entry of judgment in this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/14/2017. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO EITHER SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE OR FILE A REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO SEPTEMBER 14, 2017. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: Within ten ( 10) days from the date of service of this order, Plaintiff shall file a written response to the Court, showing cause why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiffs failure to prosecute or a motion for entry of default. The scheduling conferen ce currently set for June 20, 2017, is continued to September 14, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9. A joint scheduling report is due one week before the conference date. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order shall result in this action being dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Thorp, J)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Counsel's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record and DIRECTING Clerk of the Court to TERMINATE Michael J. F. Smith, John L. Migliazzo, and Michael J. F. Smith, APC, as Attorneys for Defendants signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/19/2017. Scheduling Conference set for 6/20/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS COUNSEL TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE OR A STATUS REPORT - DEADLINE APRIL 17, 2017 AT 5:00 P.M. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 4/14/2017. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER Requiring Defendants' Appearance at March 22, 2017 Hearing and Directing Defendants' Counsel to File an Affidavit Supplementing the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (ECF No. 45 ) signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 3/9/2017. (Valdez, E)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE - The parties shall file their respective motions on or before February 22, 2017; Oppositions to the motion shall be filed on or before March 8, 2017; A reply, if any, shall be filed on or before March 15, 2017; Oral argument on any motion filed shall be heard on March 22, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9. If no motions are filed, the Court shall convert the March 22, 2017 hearing to a status conference and the parties shall file a joint status report seven days prior to the scheduled date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/12/2017. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATION and ORDER to continue Status Conference from 1/9/2017 to 1/12/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 1/6/2017. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE FOR JANUARY 9, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/16/2016. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
35
AMENDED ORDER Re Status Report 32 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 11/17/16: Status Report due 12/15/2016, and every ninety days thereafter until the stay in this action is lifted. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER RE STATUS REPORT. The parties shall file the next status report no later then December 1, 2016, and every ninety days thereafter until the stay in this action is lifted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/6/2016. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER re STATUS REPORT, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 6/1/2016. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER Directing Parties to File Status Report, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/27/2016. (Status Report to be filed within 5 days of entry of this order.) (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
28
Order requiring parties to file status reports, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/24/2016. The parties shall continue to file a status report every ninety days until the stay in this action is lifted. (Rosales, O)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER to VACATE THE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE set for October 27, 2015 before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/6/2015. (Hernandez, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER DENYING 7 DEFENDANT'S Motion to Dismiss or Transfer Venue; GRANTING 8 DEFENDANT'S Motion to Compel Arbitration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 8/28/2015. (Hernandez, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
