Jones v. Tolson et al
| Garland A Jones |
| Department of Corrections, Tolson and Mule Creek State Prison |
| 1:2015cv01037 |
| July 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
ORDER DENYING Motion for Relief From Judgment for Lack of Jurisdiction 26 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/5/17. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER DISMISSING Action With Prejudice For Failure To State A Claim (ECF No. 16 ), Dismissal Counts As A Strike Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. 1915(g), Clerk To Terminate All Pending Motions And Close Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 9/14/2015. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER Dismissing Complaint, with Leave to Amend, for Failure to State a Claim, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 8/6/15. 30-Day Deadline. (Attachments: # 1 Amended Complaint Form)(Verduzco, M)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER. Case is transferred to the Eastern District of California. The Clerk shall terminate any pending motions and transfer the entire file to the Eastern District of California. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 7/6/2015. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2015) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/6/2015: # 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE) (ofr, COURT STAFF). [Transferred from cand on 7/7/2015.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
