Abreu v. Caviness et al
| Tai Edmund Fred Abreu |
| Caviness, Miguel, K. Allen, J. D. Lozano, James and T. Perez |
| 1:2015cv01085 |
| July 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Jennifer L. Thurston |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be DISMISSED pursuant to 28:1915A and 28:1915(e) due to Plaintiff's failure to state any claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983, his failure to comply with Court orders and his failure to prosecute the action re 22 Amended Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint ; referred to Judge Ishii,signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 05/10/2016. Objections to F&R due by 6/3/2016 (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Adopting 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/7/2015. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
15
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny Plaintiff's 14 Request for Injunctive Relief for Lack of Jurisdiction; ORDER Granting Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File a Certified Copy of his Trust Account Statements signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 11/05/2015. Referred to Judge Ishii; Objections to F&R due by 12/10/2015.(Flores, E)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
