Schauf v. American Airlines, Inc.
| John A. Schauf |
| American Airlines, Inc. |
| 1:2015cv01172 |
| July 28, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanislaus |
| UnassignedDJ |
| Sheila K. Oberto |
| Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER GRANTING 34 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint and ORDER DISMISSING CASE With Prejudice and Without Leave to Amend signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 6/20/2016. CASE CLOSED. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER DISCHARGING March 16, 2016, Order to Show Cause, 27 . Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/5/2016. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER that Plaintiff File a Written Statement Showing Cause Why Case Should Not Be Dismissed or that Plaintiff File an Amended Complaint. By no later than April 1, 2015, Plaintiff shall either a) file a written response to this Order to Show Cause; or b) file a second amended complaint. Failure to respond to this Order to Show Cause will result in dismissal of this action. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/16/2016. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 23 . Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), without prejudice and with leave to amend; Plaintiff's Demand for Atto rneys' Fees is STRICKEN without prejudice and with leave to amend, when and only when Plaintiff retains an attorney to represent him in any further proceedings in this action; and Plaintiff may file a Second Amended Complaint within 60 days of the date of this order. The hearing on the Motion to Dismiss set for 1/20/2016, is VACATED. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 1/8/2016. (Timken, A)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DENYING 3 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant's motion to dismiss the amended complaint under Rule 12(b)(5) is DENIED; Defendant's alternate motions to dismiss the amended complaint under Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(e) are DENIED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction; Defendant's motion to strike the demand for attorney's fees is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction; Plaintiff is ORDERED to file proof of service of the summons and amended complaint upon Defendan t by no later than December 2, 2015. Such proof of service must demonstrate that service was effectuated upon Defendant in accordance with California state law on or before November 25, 2015. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 9/24/2015. (Timken, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schauf v. American Airlines, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John A. Schauf | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: American Airlines, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Ernest Farmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
