Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc. v. Sun Serenity Spa et al
| Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc. |
| Sun Serenity Spa and Jacquie Perez |
| 1:2015cv01204 |
| July 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Stanislaus |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| Sandra M. Snyder |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER DISMISSING CASE for Failure to Prosecute, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/8/16. CASE CLOSED. (Gonzalez, R)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/24/2016. (Within fourteen (14) days of service of this order, plaintiff must respond in writing showing cause as to why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's 13 Motion for Default Judgment, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/11/2016. (1. The court ADOPTS IN PART the reasoning in the 17 findings and recommendations; 2. Plaintiff's 13 motion for default judgment is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. Plaintiff's request for attorney's fees is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.)(Gaumnitz, R)
|
|
Filing
17
Findings and Recommendations recommending granting Plaintiff's 13 Motion for Default Judgment, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 12/17/2015. Motion referred to Judge Drodz. Objections to F&R due by 1/22/2016. (Rosales, O)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
