Hilson v. Arnett et al
| Rasheed Hilson, Sr. |
| Jesse Arnett, Helen Gamboa, Hector Flores, Joseph Potzernitz, Jesse Gonzales, Morsh and Wentheford |
| 1:2015cv01240 |
| August 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Fresno Office |
| Kings |
| Michael J. Seng |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER Directing Clerk to Notify Court of Appeals of Settlement signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 08/16/2018. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER Following Settlement, Vacating Dates and Directing Parties to File Dispositive Documents, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 7/17/2018: 14-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER & WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM to Transport Rasheed Hilson, Sr., CDCR #G-37110, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 5/18/2018. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER Directing Responses to Plaintiff's Discovery Motions 61 , 62 , 65 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 5/18/2018: 21-Day Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER Granting Motion for Extension of Time; ORDER Denying Motion for Appointment of Counsel; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny Request for Injunctive Relief signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 04/02/2018. Referred to Judge Drozd; Objections to F&R due by 4/20/2018. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER GRANTING Defendants' Motion to Modify the Discovery and Scheduling Order 58 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 3/1/2018. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER ADOPTING 54 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS, signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/11/2018. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
54
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Dismiss Non-Cognizable Claims; Fourteen (14) Day Deadline signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 12/8/2017. Referred to Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER Adopting 52 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Law Library Access signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/28/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER Requesting Assistance of CCI Litigation Coordinator in Facilitating Plaintiff's Law Library Access; FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS to Deny Plaintiff's 51 Request for an Order Directing Access to the Law Library signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 09/10/2017. Referred to Judge Drozd.(Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION 40 AND DENYING PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS 23 signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/10/2017. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER DENYING 39 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 5/5/2017. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER GRANTING Request for Judicial Notice 24 , FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATION to Deny Defendant Arnett and Gamboa's Partial Motion to Dismiss 23 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 4/14/17: 14-Day Objection Deadline. (Hellings, J)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER DENYING 13 Motion Regarding Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies and Screening of Complaint; ORDER DENYING 14 Motion for Extension of Time, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 05/09/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:15-cv-1672 CKD PC) to Fresno (1:15-cv-1240 MJS PC) signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/11/2015; this court has not ruled on plaintiff's request to proceed ifp. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
